Program Analysis Product
Research program offices
Program analysis sites: evidence you can audit
Per-program analytical sites where every quantitative claim links to a reproducible source and a stated confidence level.
See the engagement
Work
Selected work.
Engagements for federal R&D funders, research institutions, and universities. Each one handles a different shape of problem, and each answer took the form the decision needed.
Strategic Assessment
Andrew W. Marshall Foundation
Deepfield: assessments reality can check
A strategic assessment platform that quotes its sources word for word and backs each key judgment with dated predictions that get scored.
See the engagement
Human-AI Teaming System
Georgetown School of Foreign Service (SEST)
Georgetown Wicked Problems Lab: a classroom where AI assists but never decides
A teaming platform in classroom use at Georgetown. The AI listens quietly and helps on request, while phase gates, peer review, and a twelve-rule delegation contract keep every real judgment in student hands.
See the engagement
Research Intelligence Tool
University of Michigan
Pathfinder: research pathway navigation for a map of science
A research pathway explorer that lets users chart and narrate routes between research communities on a global map of science.
See the engagement
Research Intelligence Tool
Andrew W. Marshall Foundation
The Marshall archive: making a hidden corpus navigable
A research console over the Marshall archive. A researcher asks a question, gets an answer cited to the page, and opens the original document to check it.
See the engagement
Program Analysis Product
SciTech Strategies
InnoRate: AI commercialization analysis with an evidence ledger
A document-to-report pipeline that detects innovations, generates eleven analysis sections in parallel, and verifies high-risk claims against the live web before shipping the report. Built for SciTech Strategies, where members of our team are principals.
See the engagement
Human-AI Teaming System
A clinical research alliance
Gap-aware, adjudicable drafts: a first draft a reviewer can trust
A drafting system that auto-populates structured templates from source documents. Every field arrives as a cited draft, a flagged low-confidence guess, or an explicit gap, and a reviewer adjudicates one field at a time.
See the engagement
Initiate Contact
Bring us a decision you have to make and defend.
Tell us about the decision you're trying to improve. We'll schedule a briefing with our principals to understand your environment and see whether the fit is right.
Schedule a briefing